The benches of the National Assembly had to be beautiful sparse, MEPs finally adopted Wednesday, the bill Warsmann to relax labor laws and reduce administrative business.
To achieve this, it took several parliamentary shuttle, the Socialist majority in the Senate rejected this text block for the second time, on February 20, saying that "the provisions of the text beyond the scope of legislation and simplification are fundamental reforms that call for specific depth discussions. " Ditto to the Assembly where the opposition has denounced before the vote "a challenge to the contract of employment of employees, without compensation of pay." But this time in vain.
Particularly criticized, section 40 of the new law provides that "the distribution of hours over a period longer than the week and not more than the year under a collective agreement does not constitute a change of the employment contract." In other words, if a collective agreement signed by at least 30% of union partners, an employer can now develop new working hours without the consent of each individual employee.
Telescoping with the discussions on competitiveness, employment
This article raises the ire of unions involved in the negotiations with the employers on the establishment of a pact competitive employment in companies. Indeed, the government has two months to the social partners to discuss this issue payday loan lenders. "Either we are given the entire debate, is not the time to negotiate. By divesting a part of the subject, we want to let us do the dirty work cut wages and increase working time, "storm the CGT.
More moderate CFDT a critical lack of clarity of the new provision and telescoping with the discussions on competitiveness employment. "This bill is so weird is invited into the debate and the opening of negotiations with the employers section 40 makes it unnecessary," said Marcel Grignard, number two in the central union.
"A law of August 2008 to grant greater flexibility in the modulation of working time between the two sides, but a decision of the Supreme Court dated September 28, 2010 went against this interpretation. It was just for us to clarify and specify the previous law, "says Jean-Luc Warsmann (UMP) member of the Ardennes.
After a first round on February 17, three new meetings were planned on 23, March 27 and April 13. "If, at the national level, social partners want to change Article 40, we will proceed to its amendment," reassures the hon.
ALSO READ:
"Competitiveness: the ultimate negotiation of the five-year
"The social partners will discuss working hours
"An Act relaxes the modulation of working time